The success of a card secret arises not only due to the knowledge of the cards themselves but
also due to an implied treaty between a bearer and receiver of a gift. We reconstruct the conditions
of this treaty T1 that describe the transmission of this secret from Saint-Germain to the
countess and from her to Chaplitsky. As a result, a receiver of such a gift becomes its potential
bearer. Further, not only the knowledge of concrete cards and the conditions of the treaty are
transmitted along the chain but also the ability itself to such a transmission (the property of hereditability).
Only one conditions of treaty T1 is explicated in the text – this is the prohibition of further
gambling. The other conditions are recovered according to the logic of the plot. In doing so, we
find a so-called «hidden plot» that ensables us to explain the Chaplitsky’s story and relate it to the
motif of receiving a heritage. At the same time, this finding explains why the countess opened her
mystery just to Chaplitsky (but not to other young people). This is because both of them found
themselves in the situation when a rich relative had a possibility to cover a card debt but denied to
do it. The presence of the mechanism in which the card secret is transmitted from one generation
to another, makes a card plot self-supporting.
When the countess’s ghost opens the secret to Germann, the initial conditions change, so instead
of treaty T1 that was in force in the previous cases, now a new treat T2 becomes relevant.
We analyze the difference between T1 and T2 and how the violation of T2 leads Germann to the
failure. Marriage between Germann and Lizaveta Ivanovna, necessity of which was claimed by
the ghost, is important not only for the countess’s ghost itself but also for fantastic forces that sent
the ghost to Germann. In case of the marriage, Germann could transmit the card secret to his children
and thus continue the card plot.
We also suggest an interpretation of a new condition in T2 which was absent from T1 – to
stake no more than 1 card per day. This gave possibility for Germann to fulfill the condition about
marriage before the end of game. As he ignored this condition (not given explicitly but tacitly
assumed), fantastic forces, correspondingly, also ignore theirs. They intruded in the game giving
rise to his failure. Replacing the image of a young queen with that of an old woman corresponds
to previous actions of Germann himself who preferred to seek for a card secret instead of love of
the countess's pupil and did not change this state of affairs.
Our reasonings generalize essentially a recent key observation made by V . S. Listov about
the motif of inheritance in this Pushkin work.
Burgin D. L. The Mystery of «Pikovaja dama»: A New Interpretation. In: Mnemozina. Festschrift
V. Setchkarev. Eds. J. T. Baer, N. W. Ingham. München, 1974, p. 46–56.
Davydov C. Tuz v «Pikovoj dame» [Ace in «The Queen of Spades»]. Novoe literaturnoe
obozrenie [New Literary Review], 1999, no. 37, p. 110–128. (in Russ.)
Dostoevsky F. M. Polnoe sobr. soch. [Complete collection of works]. In 30 vols. Leningrad,
1988, vol. 30, book 1. (in Russ.)
Gershenzon M. O. Mudrost' Pushkina [Wisdom of Pushkin]. Moscow, 1919. (in Russ.)
Golshtein V. Sekrety «Pikovoj damy» [Sectrets of «The Queen of Spades»]. In: Zapiski
russkoj akademicheskoj gruppy v SShA [Transactions of Russian academic group in USA],
1999–2000, vol. 30. (in Russ.)
Listov V. S. Motiv prityazaniya na nasledstvo v pushkinskoj povesti «Pikovaya dama». Bulletin
of Nizhny Novgorod N. I. Lobachevsky University, 2014, no. 2 (2), p. 47–52. (in Russ.)
Lotman Yu. M. Tema kart i kartochnoj igry v russkoj literature nachala XIX veka. In: Trudy
po znakovym sistemam [Sign systems Studies]. Tartu, 1975, vol. 7. (in Russ.)
Penkovsky A. B. Nina (Kul'turnyj mif zolotogo veka russkoj literatury v lingvisticheskom
osveshchenii) [Nina. Cultural myth of Golden age of Russian Literature in linguistic treatment].
Moscow, 2003. (in Russ.)
Pushkin A. S. Pikovaya dama. In: Pushkin A. S. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij [Complete
works]. In 16 vols. Moscow, Leningrad, AS USSR Publ., 1948, vol. 8, book 1. (in Russ.)
Retsepter V. E. Ya zhdu ego (Skrytyj sjuzhet «Skupogo rycarja») [«I am waiting for him».
Hidden plot of «Covetous Knight»]. In: Prints Pushkin [Prince Pushkin]. St. Petersburg, 2016.
(in Russ.)
Rosen N. The Magic Cards in the Queen of Spades. The Slavic and East European Journal,
1975, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 255–275.
Shmid V. «Pikovaya dama» kak metatekstual'naya novella [«The Queen of Spades»] as
a metatextual short story]. In: Shmid V. Proza kak poeziya [Prose as poetry]. Pushkin. Dostoevsky.
Chehov. Avangard. St. Petersburg, 1998, p. 103–168. (in Russ.)
Virolajnen M. N. Ironiya v «Pikovoj dame» [Irony in «The Queen of Spades»]. In: Problemy
pushkinovedeniya. Leningrad, 1978, p. 169–175. (in Russ.)
Zaslavsky O. B. «Stseny iz rytsarskikh vremen»: Obryv syuzheta kak priznak zavershennosti
teksta [Scenes from Times of Chivalery: Break of plot as indication of completeness of text].
Toronto Slavic Quarterly, 2010, no. 32. URL: http://sites.utoronto.ca/tsq/32/tsq_32_zaslavskii_
stseny_iz_rytsarskikh.pdf (in Russ.)
Zaslavsky O. B. O syuzhetnykh invariantakh boldinskikh proizvedenij A. S. Pushkina [On
plot invariants of Boldino’s works by A. S. Pushkin]. Syuzhetologiya i syuzhetografiya, 2018,
no. 2, p. 83–99. (in Russ.)
S
Zaslavsky O. B. Skazka o zolotom petushke A. S. Pushkina: syuzhet o dobyvanii bedy [The
tale of the Gold cockerel’ by A. S. Pushkin: a plot about obtaining disaster]. Russian Literature,
2007, no. 62/2, p. 241–254. (in Russ.)